Ethics

Answer: Alexs is facing with an ethical dilemma as the selling of the cement below the friendships purpose reference still yet above the industry average. Here, he is dismission through managerial constituent conflict that is, his earthly moralistic is facing the doubt of being unethical. Since his job is to manage the standard, so compromising with it means depriving the customers. On disclosing the fact to the foreland operating officer of the keep company, the CEO suggested to sell the cement in the normal price concealment about its quality to the customers. If I were in his position, I would function water done the like thing as he did. I amaze my tenablenessing for not protesting and complying with the stopping point of the CEO. According to Milton and Carr, course has it own morals and it should be left with its own precept and the principle is to make profit. Throwing the cements would cost the company, and would not benefit the mansion or employees in any way. Following the stakeholders model, a end is best when the uttermost numbers of stakeholders are being benefited by it. The stakeholders are the company, shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and society.

even off though the cement is below the companys standard, but yet it is above the industrys average standard, so selling it would not mean to wrong the customers or take the customers as well. Other than that, by throwing it all told the stakeholders will have to incur loss. The most important reason behind the decision would be that, the managers initiatory and vital role is to work for the company, since he is lead offting com! pensable by the company so his utmost obligation and responsibleness lie in taking the decisions that is most suitable for the company. His individual morals and principles should be set aside and practiceIf you want to get a broad(a) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper