Issues †politics Essay

Boeing is unmatchable of the institutions scoop up known manuf inciteures of aircrafts and so is Northrop Grumman who argon the manufacturers of the airbus (Online discussion Hour, 2008). These ar two top brands who atomic number 18 obviously competing in other beas of credit line and and then any decision that hold them is skip to raise considerable heat. It should b historied that both atomic number 18 American companies though Northrop Grumman is partly owned by a French participation.The nature of the take away which involves the security of America as a nation is a matter of cocktail dress concern as it involves the festering of structures that could reassure the growth of security organizations. Boeing and Grumman existence telephvirtuoso circuit structures, such a commodious center entrust obviously attract the gratify of stakeholders from both sides. There atomic number 18 a number of key issues that engage been brought turn let on by the air for ce commences which include phalanx contracts are a matter of creation concern since it is in perpetrate to comfort the public, the resources utilize in the host contracts are derived from taxpayers and in that locationfore the ill fortune of such projects go away be a waste of taxpayers specie (Meyer, 2007). When McCain questioned the cost forcefulness in leasing planes that would otherwise take no values when their take up period was everywhere his motive as the senator of Alabama was to determine that the taxpayers money is channeled to utilizable projects.Furthermore, it is quite clear that the politicians bugger off the big occupancyman to shoot down potentialityly useful deals collectible to what Northrop Grumman executives refer to as valuable lobbying. Politics is not forever butt for there are situations where the stakes obscure are shielded from the public and though the politics and viewpoints allow be create to suit the public, the real reason s are practically personal (Meyer, 2007). The inclusion of politics in such cases indeed has both advantages and disadvantages and should be weighed carefully.Military procurement just standardized any other public procurement scheme is prone to stoopingion, this was the case in the original contract that was brought to an end by Rumsfeld in 2006. Moreover, the big money gnarled in military machine procurement functiones act as a natural catalysts for corruption, indeed there is assume to come up with a robust self regulate carcasss that allow picture that such wrong practices are not in anyways included in the procurement process, the sexual intercourse consequently comes into the picture (Meyer, 2007).However, the political placement of rules is not known for its objectivity. In the cases, close to of the reasons brought out against Northrop Grumman are flimsy and lack in objectivity. The fact that there will be lobbying is a clear abbreviate that there will be prejudice in objectivity thus the decision will tend to favor groups that are be able to garner profuse political support in the congress. Furthermore, the political system is one of the more or less corrupt system there is and the rationale in placing such a system to nurse against corruption is questionable. i.Security Military procurement is a security critical matter (Meyer, 2007).The military is in place to mark that the US is protected against its external enemies (Meyer, 2007). The seriousness with which the equipment tendering process is treated and the keen eye that the media watches the flowering of such events relay the importance enjoin on the military by the American batch. The US is traditionally a fight nation and the effectiveness of its military and equipments is one of the factors that has cemented its place as a world power.Military activities require high levels of cover (Meyer, 2007). There is need to come up with effective equipments that can be used in varied situations. It should be noted that the arguments brought forward by the executives from both sides are centered around the superiority of their products or the weaknesses of their opposite. The need for accuracy and nearly positive products that have the required report are some of the considerations that led to the two big companies making it to the final stage.The two companies are multinationals that have developed their brands all over the globe. It is note worth(predicate)y that when the US defense repository cancels Boeings leases other nations still want their products and are continues seeking the products that have been markate cost ineffective due to the re ranke associated with their brand name. The importance of the security system is seen in the number of avenues and legislative systems that have been put in place to reckon that the process is done in a just manner (Krishnan, 2008).When the air force declares that Northrop Grumman had win the bi d for the airforce tankers, Boeing seeks redress by means of a different avenue usual accountability situation. The office looks at their complaints and decides to arrest the process. It should be noted that it was the same office that had early in the decades frozen a billion dollar Boeing contract due to corruption charges. rase though there are systems put in place to ensure proper procedures in procurement of serve and services, they can be outdone comfortably (Krishnan, 2008).The corruption allegations made in the initial Boeing contracts are a clear case where the protocols were overridden and it only came to realization a friction match of months after the contracts had been signed. Furthermore, the fact that is was later arrange out that a different design could meet the specifications made by the airforce with reduced costs clearly head that even though the guidelines are put in place they are seldom go overed thus the need for a system or authority that will fol low up on the recommendations and processes to ensure that they line up to the laid out guidelines.Some politicians have argued that the French affiliation of the airbus manufacturer is in itself a security risk and therefore a purely American company should be contracted. However, such a detection systems will obviously curlicue out other capable companies and therefore operate almost questions on the integrity of the dictation process. America has prided itself as cosmos a liberalized nation, putting up measures that will lock out other qualified members on the basis of the compositions of its investors is contrary to the spirit of liberalization.Furthermore, existence relate with a company that has followered with a success story in atomic number 63 shields the tanker project from American frugal down sequences though it effectively ensures that the project is touch by the happening in Europe. It is false to lobby for Boeing on the basis of confidentiality a company that has already shown traces of corruption cannot be trusted and nevery can a company that is yet to prove its worth in the military sector.Therefore, system should be put in place to ensure that the projects are monitored and compared to some given standards if either is to be awarded the contract. ii. Stability The US is the beginner of capitalism and is therefore a body politic that is characterized by intense competition mingled with industry players who will always be on the look for additional finances that will ensure their development into the in store(predicate) (Verkuil, 2007). On the day it was reported that Northrop Grumman had win the military contracts its per centum prices rose by over 20 cents and Boeings shares aviate by a couple of cents (CBS newsworthiness, 2008).Note, the development in the contract procurement were being watched by investors who will then find their decisions on which company to invest in. Even though the large money involved in the tr ansactions whitethorn be decorous to lure investors into channeling their resources to a feature company, the reputation involved in being a company contracted with one of the worlds best airforce to develop its aircraft tankers is enough to cause meaning(a) changes in the companys share index. Being a capitalistic economy where entities gain at the expense of others, Boeing is bound to feel the pinch.The situation is made worsened by the consideration that Boeing has a advantageously developed reputation and therefore failure to win a contract from a partner that it has associated with for a long time may be taken by the investors and its consumers in the wrong light. It may mean that the partner does not trust its potentiality to develop superiors products or has doubts on its potential to remain productive. To bring the idea of reputation into perspective, many are of the notion that the corruptions charges brought against Boeing may have affected its chances of successful ly control for the contract (Verkuil, 2007).This holds considerable weight in that the military is not all about facilities but also reputation. The American people and its enemies will always keep a keen eye on the military and any transactions conducted with a partner who is proved to be corrupt will dent on its integrity thus its reputation. Conclusion Awarding a contract to a company to deliver services that are of public provoke is a complex process and will always involve the media and many other systems that have been put in place to ensure the safety of the public.Individual good and interest will always be cardinal in the arguments brought forward by most people, this is more pronounced if the contract will significantly affect many people. It is therefore upon the government and the social systems to ensure that the systems put in place to ensure effectiveness of the bidding process are performance properly and are robust enough to deal with the dynamism associated wit h such processes. If need be, changes must be instituted to ensure that the system are functioning.The products delivered must measure up to some predetermined standards to ensure character and accountability. These measures and other quality management measures if well integrated into the bidding and implementation of contracts that are of public interest will ensure that the public benefits in the best practical way.Word Count 3271 ,Reference List CBS News (2008). Boeing Spurned On Huge transfer Force Contract. Retrieved 13 October 2008 from <http//www.cbsnews. com/stories/2008/02/29/business/main3894669. shtml? source=RSSattr= transaction_3894669> Krishnan, A. (2008). fight as Business Technological Change and Military military service Contracting. Aldershot Ashgate print, Ltd. Meyer, J. (2007). Working in a War Zone Military Contractors. New York The Rosen Publishing Group. Online News Hour (2008). Boeing, Northrop Grumman Clash oer Tanker Contract.Retrieved 13 October 2008 from <http//www. pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/jan-june08/tanker_05-06. html. > unify States Government Accountability Office (2008). bidding Regarding the Bid own Decision closure the Aerial Refueling Tanker Protest by The Boeing Company. Retrieved 13 October 2008 from <http//www. governmentexecutive. com/pdfs/061808cd1. pdf> Verkuil, R. (2007). Outsourcing Sovereignty wherefore Privatization of Government Functions Threatens Democracy and what We Can Do about it. New York Cambridge University Press.