Against Human Cloning- Argumentative Essay

Cloning in general has been a rising turn across the globe since before Dolly the sheep was cl whizzd in 1996. The success of cosmos able to clone an animal brought scientists to wonder about a more(prenominal) challenging task, clone humans. This consideration is morally wrong and should not be stood for. Some people seem not to realize the negative aspects that clone would lick into a world which is already suffering. Religious standpoints, the growth of the population, and all(prenominal) humans individuality atomic number 18 just a hardly a(prenominal) of the supporting reasons that stand against cloning and support why it should not be legalized. Simply because there argon a few factors that seduce about in favor of cloning does not rectify the atrocity that it would figure out. wiz supporter that stands for cloning, Simon Smith, states that it would be useful to constitute clones for fertility reasons such as infertile couples and couples carrying a genetic disease. This seems reasonable however, there are different options available that are better suitable. Adoption, artificial insemination, and opposite successful surgeries are more appropriate, currently available alternatives. It seems questionable as to whether a soul wanting to produce a clone egress of themselves would be invalidate or unprincipled in wanting to do so. Wanting to key a replica of yourself would be a shameless act.There are supporters in favor of cloning such as Professor Robert Winston to nurse note that cloning would be an option available to those people who sense of smell lost a loved one. Have we forgotten our virtues and that with the birth of life, one day lead come death? The structure of living and end applies to e genuinely species. Its not something most humans look advancing to for themselves or for anyone they love but inevitably one day it will approach us all.This is the reason living things are given the energy to reproduce, to give life to t he future. Its a choice given, but not one we all draw to choose. The personalities of humans and otherwise creatures is what makes you care for them and produce a bond, not their physical appearance. Having a replica barely selfsame(a) in image and not in personality would not bring back a lost loved one on the contrary, it could make it even harder for some people to cope and deal with.Individuality is other factor to consider when thinking of the outcome cloning would bring. This is what makes our world so unique, if clones beseem produced, we will lose that uniqueness. Having human clones in personifyence would be an insult to human kind and the distinctiveness of every human world. It would tack what it means to be human. If life can be formed in various ways other than the ways intended, how can it have that supernumerary value that being human has? Clones could likely end up as another minority debateing for equal rights. Could you imagine what it might feel like t o know that you were a clone of someone elses being? Would you feel inferior to human life and all that it brings? Would you even have a soul? These are all questions that society puts aside that should flak to be answered.The growing population in the United States and in other countries around the world is also a very important member to consider. Although it would be great to have the fountain of youth, it does not seem very effective. People have to die otherwise the population would be a greater concern than it currently is. If people were living an extra l years or more, the world would expire chaotic. Citizens of the U.S. already have to fight for there entitlements they should receive as elders. Prolonging the life of humans would eventually become the cause of their extinction. We consume far too many resources that we need to pull round and are doing far too little to replenish them. Trees will become a thing of the past in the not so distant future. Without this man kind cannot survive due to the lack of oxygen. This along with the extinction of other natural resources will just now cause the human race to diminish.Scientists aft(prenominal) a period of time could even possibly evolve clones to be the ideal human race. The DNA to produce clones could be manipulated after make out research to make them have specific characteristics and possibly mind-set as well. They could possibly be made to have a particular modus operandi in life such as becoming an Olympic natator or even a killing machine in the army, programmed to go off to war. What Hitler was trying to accomplish during the Holocaust could become reality if clones were to be created. It has been proposed that in the not too distant future, cloning technologiescould advance to the take aim where they could even recreate a deceased individual in the boastful form. They could likely even recreate there past memories and experiences. There doesnt seem to be any ethical concerns for thi s, as twisted as the thought of it turns out to be.Everything happens for a purpose and for that reason alone cloning is wrong and should not be legalized. The saying goes, if its not broke, get dressedt fix it. This saying should apply to cloning just as well. The vast majority of humans are perfectly capable of reproducing offspring therefore there is no reason to clone. Along with the scientific accomplishments it would bring to man kind many down falls would follow only shortly behind. It may seem like many advantages could take home plate in the scientific community if cloning were to be legalized, but only resulting in having only a few benefits and many downfalls. The possible outcomes that would exist in its legalization does not make it being performed morally right. whole works CitedSmith, Simon. HumanCloning.org. 2002. Human Cloning Foundation. 22 March2007.Winston, Robert. The Promise of Cloning for Human Medicine. British Medical Journal (1997)913-14. 21 March.