Modifications to the National School Lunch Program Essay

Introduction crude-made modifications made to the depicted object aim luncheon Program menu aim caused contr everyplacesy all across the nation. In last year The depicted object take aim eat computer computer weapons platform have been under scrutiny and major changes have been made to the ingredients and preparation of prep atomic number 18 daydays lunches.The USDA reports that the all the modifications to the drill lunches argon focus towards improving the health of all work suppurate children, contri neverthelessing to the fight against childhood fleshiness and succinctly to improve the health of all children across the nation. This research would explore the record of the different federal come alongncies involve in the discipline livingal services, the to the highest degree comprehensive changes in the take aim alimentational environment , the old and freshly menus choices and how changes are imp affecting students (National school day dejeuner Pr ogram,NSLP 2012).Research StatementAccording to the Unites States part of Agriculture nutriment and pabulum Service the late(a) changes to the National take aim Lunch program have been an grievous aid in the fight against childhood obesity and to help change student eating habits towards a healthy approach.In the last 4 years the Senate of the coupled Stated has proposed different legislative body changes to the National School Lunch menu al miserableing one million millions of dollars to contri just nowe towards a healthy approach modifying what student age children are consuming during school hours. The nearly comprehensive changes have been oriented towards reducing fat, sugar and sodium, and including much veg as part of the nonchalant school cafeteria menu (United States incision of Agriculture, USDA 2012).initial Research QuestionHow the recent changes to the national school lunch program can improve the students health? By analyzing the recent changes to the n ational school lunch program we leave be open to compare somewhat of the differences between some the new and improve school lunch menu and how these changes are imp motioning students across the nation.Review of literatureThe National School Lunch Act was a justice established under the administration of chairman Harry Truman in 1946. The original purpose of the meet was to help local farmers with surplus produce and using these foods to feed school age children. After round offing the principles of the act, members of the senate requested the establishment of a national program that under the guidelines of the National School Lunch Act, would oversee all trading operations associated with school lunch repasts, reason for the creation of the National School Lunch program.The National School lunch program manages one of the largest federally aid meal programs that provides nutrimentally balanced meals excuse or at crushed cost to school age children. The national schoo l lunch program takes cash subsides and foods provided by the U.S Department of Agriculture, in return the national school lunch program must meet nutritional federal requirements and near important must offer meals free or at low cost to all student age children. According to reported statistics from the U.S Department of Agriculture the National School Lunch feeds over 30 million students each day (NSLP, 2012)There is no doubt that the student nutrition subject has been an important topic of national connect in the history of our country. In 1966, The pincer victuals Act was a law write by President Lyndon B Johnson, encouraged by a national concern over nutrition in school age children.The Child Nutrition Act became to be an instrument to facilitate the process of run into nutritional needs of children under the guidelines of the National School Lunch Program. The act overly helped established the school based breakfast program providing free breakfast for children in publ ic and nonprofit schools, during the signing of this act chairperson Johnson use a famous phrase that would change forever the futures of national school lunches Good food is essential to good larn (USDA, 2012)U.S Department of Agriculture is a federal funded division who is responsible to all operations in the nation pertaining to farming agriculture and food. Better k instantlyn as the USDA the division not only promotes and helps farming and agriculture issues but ensures food safety across the nation. The USDA is one of the oldest federally department created by President Abraham Lincoln in 1862. The USDA oversees a extensive amount of operative units in the united states including the USDA Food and nutritionary go who major goal is to provide healthy food to families in need, the department also collaborate closely with the National School Lunch program providing foods that are of nutritional value (USDA, 2012)On December 13th, 2010 President Obama sign into a law the pr ofound, Hunger Free Act of 2010. This act was creating to combat the alarming rates of childhood obesity cases in the U.S. The now law came to update the school meals standards who reflected very little changes in nutrition in the last 15 years, the HHFK Act also had an impact on the USDA, changing the foods providing to the National School lunch program and succinctly reflecting changes in meal nutritional standards in schools across the nation.In the 2009 a reappraisal from the demonstrate of Medicine recommended several updates to the National School lunch menus, the review found that the school cafeteria menus were not meeting the dietary guidelines for school age children stated by the U.S Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Services (Healthy Hunger-Free Act, HHFA 2012)In 2011 the USDA proposed new regulations based on the finding of the Institute of Medicine of the United States. The process of modification of the school cafeteria menus begin slow but steady on sch ools across the nation, the changes included whole corpuscle servings on all meals reduce saturated fat sugar and sodium, and to a greater extent fresh fruit and ve prolongables.Elizabeth Ippel, executive director of The Academy of Global Citizenship in Chicago, splatters about the important of nutritions good nutrition is essential and a very integral component to effective selecting. The changes are significant and correspond to Mrs. Ippel the students are responding positive to the modifications (Leamy, 2012)Heres an example of a before and after lunch menuBeforeAfterBreaded crab patty on a white roll Baked tilt NuggetsFruit popsicleWhole wheat rollLow fat milkMashed potatoesBroccoliPeaches hop-skip MilkDiscussionOn December 13, 2010 president Obama signed into law 111-296 the Healthy Hunger Free Act of 2010. The act is one of the most comprehensive proposals in the school nutritional environment in over 15 years the main goal of this law is to update school meals nutrition al standards to help combat childhood obesity and help students progress to healthy eating habits. Beginning in July 2012 the new lunch meal pattern go away be in effect changing what students will be consuming during lunch in the school year 2012-2013.The new proposed meal components includes key changes for children K and above, these changes requires that school lunches offer a daily variety of whole grains, fruit and vegetables.In the fruit category, each meal provided by school cafeterias must include cup of fresh, frozen or canned fruits, prepared or compound with water and not syrup. of vegetables on each meal is another requirement in the daily school lunch menus the new regulations required a variety of vegetable groups including disastrous green, red/orange, legumes, starchy and other vegetables.On the area of whole grains, breads and cereals are required on each meal as long as the food item includes more than 8 grams of grains. The act has also make up ones mind th e amount of flavored milks opting for only low fat milk during meals. Calories are also under a scope view limiting the calorie ranges according to age groups. Trans-fat is banned completely from school cafeteria menus and the act has also a plan to limit sodium gradually over the next decade, to make believe the goal of keeping sodium at a no more than 600 mg per meal, equal to a diet frozen meal (HHFKA, 2012).The changes in the cafeteria school menu are impacting students and teachers equally, besides of more nutritional value, the new menus now offered more quantity amounts of fitter foods, satisfying the hunger of millions of students and reflecting healthier attitudes in the classrooms. LuAnn Coenen from Appleton Central High School in Wisconsin cheers the new regulations in the cafeteria menus and states Since the introductions of the new food program, I have noticed and enormous difference in the behavior of my students in the classroom,I can say without uncertainty that it s changed my job as trader.It seems that less sugary foods and drinks are impacting students behavior. An associate professor of education at the Lehigh university conducted a study of over 2000 lunchrooms across the nations, the conclusions indicated that healthier and less sugary meals carries a calmer atmosphere in the classroom this calmer demeanor is reflects when students go back to the classrooms creating a trickling effect.Taylor a student from Appleton High commented about the changes she felt since the cafeteria menus changed Id say being able to concentrate better. Susan Graham principal from Melrose Elementary in Tampa Florida confirms that her discipline referrals have decreased 50 % We get a lot more done, I think its a lot more efficient work environment for all of us, Grahams say (abcnews,2012).Berger (2005) wrote about the importance of a nearly balanced meal for the straitlaced development of childrens brain development, and how school meal programs played an i mportant rolled in childrens brain development, by providing a well balanced meal while in school children can fulfill proper brain development a subsequently their ability to learn will be maximized (Berger, 2005).The changes happening in schools cafeterias might seem insignificant, but replacing extra-high mallow pizza, deep fried chicken for whole wheat pizza and baked fish nuggets, represent a huge step towards fashioning students healthy.Some modifications to the school lunch menu have happened slowly and some hidden from students, like replacing full fat cheese with a low fat mozzarella cheese in the pizzas, as well as using whole wheat bread on grill cheese sandwiches. Dr. Saira Jan a Rutgers University Professor (2006) comments on children obesity and diabetes rising numbers Kids shoot from what they are offered. They are hungry, they will eat. You can offer carrots or french fries. We have a big health-care problem. We cant just talk about it (Weekly Reader, 2006).Concl usionIn conclusion the overall national concern over childhood obesity and the rising rate of diseases in children connect to overweight issues is currently being addressed by different entities in charge of school nutrition. The National School lunch program has and will make modification on the students lunch menu to feed students healthier foods in the effort to fight childhood obesity.Even though on that point has been mixed opinions about the effectiveness of the lunch menu modifications, the HHFKA guidelines demonstrate howReferences around USDA. (2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www. farming.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=ABOUT_USDABerger, Kathleen. (2005).The Developing Person Throughout the Lifespan. 6th ed.Worth. 140-142Child Nutritional Act.(2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf Food Fight Shou ld School Lunches be healthier? Current Events, a Weekly Reader publication,17 Feb.(2006) Retrieved fromHealthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. (2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/ enactment/cnr_2010.htmQuestions & Answers on the Final Rule, Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs(2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/ administration/Policy-Memos/2012/SP10-2012osr2.pdfLazor, K., Chapman, N., & Levine, E. (2010).No.80. Vol.4. 200-206 Soy Goes to School Acceptance of Healthful, Vegetarian Options in Maryland Middle School Lunches. Journal Of School Health.Leamy, Elizabeth.(2011). Exclusive USDA to Announce Healthier new-fangled School Lunch Guidelines. Retrieved from http//abcnews.go.com/Health/ConsumerNews/usda-announce-school-lunch-guidelines/story?id=12603193Mary Bruce. (2010). Coming shortly? Healthier School Lunches. Retrieved from http//abcnews.go.com/Politics/healthier-school-lunches-senate-approves-45-billion-bill/story?id=11345256Mcginn, D., & Popescu, R. (2007).No 150. Vol.17. Unlucky Charms At Lunch. Newsweek. Retrieved from http//mediacast.usw.edu8045/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA169875850&v=2.1&u=nm_a_elin&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=wNational School Lunch Program.(2012).United States Department of Agriculture Food and NutritionService. Retrieved from http//www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Lunch/Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs, No 17, Vol.77. (2012). United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http//www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdfStudents behave better with healthy lunches. (2012). Abc. go. Retrieved fromhttp//abcnews.go.com/GMA/AmericanFamily/story?id=125404&page=1